Percentage of total 340B savings accounted for by community health centers
Percentage of large CHCs utilizing these savings to specifically provide services for rural healthcare to rural communities
Large CHCs use 340B savings for chronic disease prevention and management
Aside from minimal oversight funding, 340B program discounts are not government-funded
Community health centers serve patients regardless of insurance status or ability to pay, often in communities facing the greatest barriers to care. The 340B program provides a flexible funding stream that allows health centers to meet those needs in real time.
ACH member data shows that:
This is exactly what Congress intended by creating a stable resource that allows safety-net providers to do more with limited funding.
340B savings are reinvested into services that would otherwise be financially unsustainable. Across the country, health centers use 340B to:
Because community health centers are governed by patient-majority boards, these investments are driven by community need and not profit motives.
Despite its proven value, the 340B program is under increasing pressure from policy and market forces that threaten its ability to support patient care.
These challenges come at a time when health centers are facing rising costs, workforce shortages, and increased demand for services making 340B more essential than ever.
ACH supports policies that protect and strengthen the 340B program while ensuring transparency and accountability.
Ensure the program continues to function as intended—helping health centers stretch limited resources and expand access to care.
Protect health centers’ ability to partner with pharmacies so patients can access medications in their communities.
Oppose policies that replace upfront discounts with rebate systems that delay savings and shift financial risk onto health centers.
Stop practices that reduce reimbursement or divert 340B savings away from patient care.
Support transparency and accountability measures that do not restrict participation or reduce patient access.
Ensure health centers retain the ability to respond to local needs and reinvest savings directly into patient services.
ACH has played a direct role in influencing federal 340B legislation by ensuring proposals reflect how community health centers actually use the program.
Impact: Health center priorities are now reflected in active legislative proposals—not just reactive advocacy.
ACH has successfully reframed 340B discussions around patients and communities.
Impact: Policymakers increasingly view 340B as a care delivery tool, not just a pricing program
ACH has helped solidify recognition—on Capitol Hill and among policymakers—that contract pharmacies are essential to patient access.
Impact: Contract pharmacy access is now a central issue in 340B policy, not just a side conversation.
One of ACH’s most significant advocacy achievements has been pushing back against proposals to convert 340B into a rebate system.
Impact: The rebate model is now widely recognized as harmful to health centers and remains highly contested rather than adopted.
ACH introduced a proactive policy framework for reform.
Impact: Shifted the conversation from “protect vs. change” to “how to improve 340B without harming patients.”
ACH has strengthened its influence by bringing together diverse stakeholders.
Impact: The importance of 340B for health centers is more coordinated and harder to dismiss.